Hello everyone, I’m CH Watch. I’m passionate about sharing watch knowledge, comparing genuine and counterfeit pieces, and evaluating watches to guide you through the world of horology. Today, I’ll be discussing the new Rolex Datejust 41mm from CLEAN Factory, often referred to as C Factory for convenience. Recently, the CLEAN Factory has focused heavily on Rolex models, especially since the VS and AR factories have not been shipping. This market shift has created a gap for some notable Rolex products, such as the Greenwich Submariner and the Daytona, which remains a standout piece. Although the N Factory is closed, we still have a good amount of inventory available, but new pieces are becoming harder to find once sold out.

Now, let’s dive into the blue-faced Clean Factory Rolex Datejust. The five-link and three-link versions are both available, and CLEAN has released them simultaneously, offering flexibility for buyers. The blue dial is one of the hardest colors to produce and remains incredibly popular, similar to the green Submariner in the Submariner line. The difficulty in achieving the right hue for the dial is a significant challenge, just as with the green Submariner’s bezel and dial. Alright, let’s get to the details!

What is the quality of the CLEAN Factory Rolex Datejust 41mm with the blue dial and 3235 movement?

When discussing the VS Factory previously, we noted that the blue dial should be a bright blue in direct sunlight. Very few shades of blue can endure this test; if they do, it indicates a high-quality product because they won’t shift to a purple hue in sunlight. The ideal shade is a bluish blue, free from any noticeable purple tones. Achieving this balance is quite challenging. I’m filming this in the afternoon with optimal sunlight, and you can see that there’s no hint of purple—just a stunning blue. It’s worth mentioning that this video is shot directly with a mobile phone, not a camera, which captures the blue beautifully. This was something we were truly impressed with when we received the watch.

Additionally, the Clean Factory utilizes an all-in-one 3235 movement instead of the 2884. While the AR Factory also offers decent options, they use the 2824 movement. The VS Factory previously had the 3235 movement, but it appears to be discontinued now. Essentially, the 3235 from VS is no longer available. In the current market, the 3235 movement is considered the best option available. It’s also an all-in-one movement, with the one from Clean being produced at the Shanghai Movement Factory. In terms of stability and performance, they are quite comparable—if we were to rate them, I would give one a score of 10 and the other 9.5.

The stability of the VS Factory’s 3235 movement, produced in Dandong, is on par with that of the CLEAN Factory’s 3235 movement, which is made in Shanghai. So, what is the key difference between the two?

Regarding polishing, the Dandong-produced 3135 movement features finer detailing, giving it a more attractive appearance, while the Shanghai movement prioritizes restoration and stability over aesthetics. Each movement factory has its own focus, leading to variations in product quality. Just as one might appreciate both beauty and inner qualities in a partner, the same applies to movements—it’s ideal to have both, but if forced to choose, inner qualities take precedence.

The 3235 and 3135 movements from Dandong excel in both external and internal quality, while those from the Shanghai factory may lack a bit in aesthetics but maintain similar internal performance. This distinction can be confusing, but it’s essential to understand.

Now, let’s examine the five-bead watch strap, previously criticized when it was produced by the former ZZ factory. The owner has since switched to the same supplier as AR for the watch straps and components. However, AR doesn’t fully endorse this transition, as they only share a supplier, not the same product. Consequently, the Submariner has upgraded its watch straps to differentiate from Clean, allowing for compatibility without relying on AR’s reputation.

The factories responsible for the watch buckle and case remain the same, ensuring the watch strap retains its quality. While I haven’t compared them directly, it’s likely that any upgrades made are improvements rather than downgrades. Previously, AR factory’s straps were highly regarded, and slight changes were made for distinction. The engraving on the buckles has seen minor adjustments, but overall, the quality is still commendable.

Under sunlight, the log displays impressive spray noise, with strong graininess and a clean, beautiful finish. The watch head is equally important—it must exhibit a bright blue hue that looks stunning in the sun, creating a very pleasing visual experience.

First and foremost, I want to highlight the calendar feature, which is my favorite aspect. Unlike the calendars from AR and VS factories that often appear a bit thick or have some ink overflow, this one is perfectly centered and aligned, both vertically and horizontally. Each piece in the first batch maintains this precision, which is impressive, especially considering the high demand.

Additionally, the calendar is visually pleasing and easy on the eyes. When you compare it to genuine models, you’ll notice fewer magnification distortions on this calendar, making it quite appealing.

Now, let’s talk about the bezel, which has been beautifully crafted. It reflects light at different angles, showcasing its quality. The design features a solid bottom with a hollow top, similar to the original 3135 Submariner. This construction is crucial; the integrated movement requires a solid center axis for integrity.

In terms of overall aesthetics, feel, and craftsmanship, I’d rate this watch highly, even suggesting that it surpasses previous models. However, it’s essential to note that comparing it directly to VS isn’t fair; VS has its own history of producing high-quality watches.

I’ve personally not had the opportunity to evaluate the blue-faced VS for nearly five months since it was discontinued, and I haven’t encountered any new models since April 9th. Therefore, I can confidently say that this one is currently the best option available.

Which is the better choice for the CLEAN factory Rolex Datejust 3235 movement: a five-link or a three-link bracelet?

Now, let’s examine the three-link bracelet. The three-link and five-link bracelets offer different wearing experiences. The five-link bracelet is looser and softer, conforming more closely to the wrist, while the three-link bracelet has a more traditional feel, similar to that of the Submariner. Ultimately, it comes down to personal preference; neither is inherently better or worse—it’s simply a matter of style.

Is the CLEAN factory Rolex Datejust 3235 movement a worthwhile purchase?

Let’s take a closer look at the CLEAN factory’s 3235 movement. If you decide to buy it, there’s no need to open multiple pieces. This movement features a cardless design, but keep in mind that it’s essentially a faux cardless mechanism. It also has the two speed hands installed in reverse, which gives it a polished look. If you focus solely on these components, you might overlook other important details. The engraving below includes a code, and all the gears are authentic. When you turn it over, you’ll notice three gears that move when the automatic rotor spins, with a striking red detail. You might see a line that indicates this isn’t just a splint machine; it’s a genuine integrated movement. Additionally, the 3235 automatic rotor contains a real purple gem at its center, not just a decorative piece. The polishing on the movement is commendable but not overly flashy. Both the Shanghai Movement Factory and the now-closed Dandong Movement Factory produce impressive movements, showcasing quality craftsmanship. How would I summarize this?

I don’t believe there’s much else to discuss in detail, as this model is quite established. However, if it were to be developed further now, it would feel like redistributing the existing market share. Previously, a single company dominated this space, but after facing some setbacks, the only option left has been to purchase the 2824 movement from the AR factory, which is a solid choice. Unfortunately, the AR factory has been reluctant to ship lately. Currently, the best option available is indeed well-made but not without its limitations; it serves more as a supplementary choice. It still features an integrated movement based on the previous AR design, along with a solid center axis and a comfortable strap. You can think of it as a combination of the AR factory’s case and strap, enhanced by the craftsmanship of VS and the integrated movement. The price point remains comparable, making it an attractive option. I hope this overview of CH watches proves helpful. If you’re interested, I recommend keeping an eye on this site for more detailed disassemblies, real-life evaluations, and comparisons between authentic and replica models. For those who prefer a straightforward approach and aren’t swayed by sales pitches, feel free to reach out via WhatsApp for further inquiries.